Percepções e Usos da Terra: Retórica Agrária e Política Agrícola na Grécia sob o Regime de Metaxas (1936-1941)

Autores

  • Dimitris Douros National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Dimitris Angelis-Dimakis Autonomous University of Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.3208

Palavras-chave:

Agrarismo, Terra, Nacionalismo , Grécia

Resumo

Este documento visa explorar as formas como os conceitos de "Natureza" e "Terra" foram incorporados e mobilizados na retórica do regime ditatorial estabelecido na Grécia por Ioannis Metaxas a 4 de Agosto de 1936. Em primeiro lugar, examina as ligações entre a construção de uma paisagem nacional e o surgimento de uma nova ideologia nacionalista na Grécia entre guerras. Em seguida, examina as diferentes formas como as ideias politizadas da natureza informaram as pesquisas e práticas agronómicas e foram traduzidas no pensamento e políticas políticas políticas da Metaxas. Estas conotações ideológicas da Terra e da Natureza inscrevem-se na doutrina filosófica e económica do "nacionalismo camponês". Baseado principalmente no agrarianismo radical e no neo-romantismo, este discurso ganhou impulso no início dos anos 30 e permeou políticas económicas e agrárias autárquicas, especialmente após o colapso do governo parlamentar. Nesta linha, a ditadura da Metaxas e as suas percepções do ambiente alinham indiscutivelmente com as características e trajectórias dos regimes autoritários que floresceram em toda a Europa no período entre guerras.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografias Autor

Dimitris Douros, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

PhD Candidate
Faculty of History and Archaeology,
School of Philosophy

Dimitris Angelis-Dimakis, Autonomous University of Madrid

PhD Candidate
Department of Contemporary History
Faculty of Philosophy and Liberal Arts

Referências

Alivizatos, Babis. 1938. Κράτος και Αγροτική Πολιτική [State and Agricultural policy]. Athens: s.n.

Alivizatos, Babis. 1939. Αγροτική Πολιτική [Agricultural Policy]. Athens: s.n.

Armiero, Marco. 2014. “Introduction: Fascism and nature”. Modern Italy 19(3): 241-245.

Armiero, Marco and Wilko Graf von Handerberg. 2013. “Green Rhetoric in Blackshirts: Italian Fascism and the Environment”. Environment and History 19: 283-311.

Beaton, Roderick. 2020. Ελλάδα: Βιογραφία ενός σύγχρονου έθνους [Greece: Biography of a Modern Nation]. Athens: Patakis.

Biasillo, Roberta and Claiton Marcio da Silva. 2021. “The Very Grounds Underlying Twentieth-Century Authoritarian Regimes: Building Soil Fertility in Italian Libya and the Brazilian Cerrado”. Comparative Studies in Society and History 63 (2): (forthcoming).

Bogiatzis, Vassilis. 2012. Μετέωρος Μοντερνισμός. Τεχνολογία, Ιδεολογία της Επιστήμης και Πολιτική στην Ελλάδα του Μεσοπολέμου (1922-1940) [Ambivalent Modernism: Technology, Scientific Ideology and Politics (1922-1940)]. Athens: Eurasia.

Bregianni, Catherine. 2007. “La utopía rural de un régimen autoritario. La política cooperativista de la dictadura de Metaxas (Grecia 1936-1940)”. Historia Agraria 42: 327-351.

Caprotti, Federico, and Maria Kaïka. 2008. “Producing the ideal fascist landscape: nature, materiality and the cinematic representation of land reclamation in the Pontine Marshes”. Social & Cultural Geography 9(6): 613-634.

Carillo, Mario. 2021. “Agricultural Policy and Long-Run Development: Evidence from Mussolini's Battle for Grain”, The Economic Journal, 131 (634): 566–597.

Chatzivassileiou, Evanthis. 2010. “Η πτώση του δημοκρατικού πολιτεύματος” [The fall of democracy]. In Η δικτατορία του Ιωάννη Μεταξά, 1936-1941 [The dictatorship of Ioannis Metaxas, 1936-1941], edited by Evanthis Chatzivassileiou, 17-34. Athens: Dimosiografikos Organismos Lambraki.

Dertilis, Giorgos. 2018. Ιστορία της νεότερης και σύγχρονης Ελλάδας 1750-2015 [History of modern and contemporary Greece 1750-2015]. Heraklion: Panepistimiakes Ekdoseis Kritis.

Evelpidis, Chrisos. 1944. Η γεωργία της Ελλάδος: Οικονομική και κοινωνική άποψις [The Greek agriculture: economic and social aspects]. Athens.

Fernández-Prieto, Lourenzo, Juan Pan-Montojo, and Miguel Cabo. 2014. “Fascism and modernity in the European countryside: a global view”. In Agriculture in the age of fascism. Authoritarian technocracy and rural modernization, 1922-1945, edited by Lourenzo Fernandez-Prieto, Juan Pan-Montojo and Miguel Cabo, 19-42. Turnhout: Brepols.

Franghiadis, Alexis. 2020. “Το τέλος του οικονομικού φιλελευθερισμού και η ανάπτυξη της κρατικής παρέμβασης στην Ελλάδα κατά τον Μεσοπόλεμο” [The end of economic liberalism and the rise of state interventionism in interwar Greece]. In Ο μεγάλος μετασχηματισμός: Κράτος και πολιτική στην Ελλάδα του 20ού αιώνα [The great transformation: State and politics in 20th century Greece] edited by Giannis Voulgaris, Kostas Kostis and Sotiris Rizas. Athens: Patakis.

Franghiadis, Alexis. 2007. Ελληνική Οικονομία (19ος-20ος αιώνας): Από τον Αγώνα της Ανεξαρτησίας στην Οικονομική και Νομισματική Ένωση της Ευρώπης [The Greek Economy (19th-20th centuries): From the Struggle for Independence to the Economic and Monetary Unification of Europe]. Athens: Nefeli.

Fuller, Mia. 2007. Moderns abroad: architecture, cities and Italian imperialism. London & New York: Routledge.

Gallant, Thomas. 2017. Νεότερη Ελλάδα: Από τον Πόλεμο της Ανεξαρτησίας μέχρι τις μέρες μας [Modern Greece: From the Independence War up to our days]. Athens: Pedio.

Guimarães, Paulo. 2020. “Environmental conflicts and men-nature representations in the building of the Portuguese European identity”. In People, Nature and Environments: Learning to Live Together edited by Ana Cristina Roque, Cristina Brito and Cecilia Veracini, 161-174. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Herb, Guntram and David Kaplan. 2017. “Introduction: Scaling the Nation”. In Scaling Identities: Nationalism and Territoriality edited by Guntram Herb and David Kaplan, 1-3. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Isenberg, Andrew. 2014. “Introduction: A New Environmental History”. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental History edited by Andrew C. Isenberg, 1-20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, Donald Hughes. 2006. What is Environmental History?. Polity Press, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kallis, Aristotle. 2017. “‘Ideas in flux...’: The ‘4th of August’ dictatorship in Greece as a political ‘departure’ in search of ‘destination’”. In Corporatism and Fascism: The Corporatist Wave in Europe, edited by Antonio Costa Pinto, 272-291. London & New York: Routledge.

Kallis, Aristotle. 2010. “Neither Fascist nor Authoritarian: The 4th of August Regime in Greece (1936-1941) and the Dynamics of Fascistisation in 1930s Europe”. East Central Europe 37(2-3), 303-330.

Kostis, Kostas. 2019. Ο πλούτος της Ελλάδας: η ελληνική οικονομία από τους Βαλκανικούς πολέμους μέχρι σήμερα [The wealth of Greece: Greek economy from the Balkan Wars up to our days]. Athens: Patakis.

Lee, Robert and Sabine Wilke. 2005. “Forest as Volk: Ewiger Wald and the Religion of Nature in the Third Reich”. Journal of Social and Ecological Boundaries 1(1): 21-46.

Lekan, Thomas. 2004. Imagining the Nation in Nature: Landscape Preservation and German Identity (1885-1945). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Liakos, Antonis. 2019. Ο ελληνικός 20ός αιώνας [The greek 20th century]. Athens: Polis.

Lovin, Clifford. 1967. “Blut Und Boden: The Ideological Basis of the Nazi Agricultural Program”. Journal of the History of Ideas 28(2): 279-288.

Mavrogordatos, Giorgos. 2017. Μετά το 1922: Η παράταση του Διχασμού [After 1922: The prolongation of the National Schism]. Athens: Patakis.

Mazower, Mark. 2009. Η Ελλάδα και η οικονομική κρίση του Μεσοπολέμου [Greece and the interwar economic crisis]. Athens: Μ.Ι.Ε.Τ.

McNeill, John Robert and Erin Stewart Mauldin. 2012. “Global Environmental History: An Introduction”. In A Companion to Global Environmental History edited by John Robert McNeill and Erin Stewart Mauldin, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Metaxas, Ioannis. 1969. Λόγοι και Σκέψεις 1936-1941 [Speeches and Reflections 1936-1941] (volumes: 1, 2) Athens: Govostis.

Mosse, George. 1987. Masses and Man: Nationalist and Fascist Perceptions of Reality, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Panagiotopoulos, Dimitris. 2020. “Ο πρώτος αγρότης, οι συνοδοιπόροι του και η μεταξική απόπειρα εκφασισμού της αγροτικής κοινωνίας” [The first peasant, his followers and the metaxist attempt to fasisctize rural society]. Τα Ιστορικά [Historica Review] 71: 27-48.

Panagiotopoulos, Dimitris. 2010. Αγροτικό Κόμμα Ελλάδας: όψεις του αγροτικού κινήματος στην Ελλάδα [Agrarian Party of Greece: aspects of the agrarian movement in Greece]. Athens: Plethron.

Papagaryfallou, Panagiotis. 1973. Η Εξέλιξις των Γεωργικών Συνεταιρισμών εν Ελλάδι από την επανάσταση του 1821 μέχρι το 1940 [The evolution of the rural cooperatives in Greece from the revolution of 1821 up to 1940]. Athens: Papazisis.

Pelt, Mogens. 2014. “Stages in the Development of the ‘Fourth of August’ Regime in Greece”. In Rethinking Fascism and Dictatorship in Europe, edited by Aristotle Kallis and Antonio Costa-Pinto, 198-218. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Petmezas, Sokratis. 2012. Προλεγόμενα στην ιστορία της ελληνικής αγροτικής οικονομίας του Μεσοπολέμου [Introduction to the history of the interwar Greek agriculture]. Athens: Alexandria.

Ploumidis, Spyridon. 2016. Το καθεστώς Ιωάννη Μεταξά (1936-1941) [The Ioannis Metaxas’ Regime (1936-1941)]. Athens: Hestia.

Ploumidis, Spyridon. 2014. “Corporatist ideas in inter-war Greece: From Theory to Practice (1922-1940)”. European History Quarterly 44(1): 55-79.

Ploumidis, Spyridon. 2013. “‘Peasantist nationalism’ in inter-war Greece (1927–41)”. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 37(1): 111-129.

Ploumidis, Spyridon. 2011. Έδαφος και μνήμη στα Βαλκάνια: ο ‘γεωργικός εθνικισμός’ στην Ελλάδα και τη Βουλγαρία (1927-1946) [Territory and Memory in the Balkans: “peasantist nationalism” in Greece and Bulgaria (1927-1946)]. Athens: Patakis.

Pois, Robert. 1986. National Socialism and the Religion of Nature. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Saraiva, Tiago. 20161. Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Saraiva, Tiago. 20162. “Fascist modernist landscapes: Wheat, dams, forests, and the making of the Portuguese New State”. Environmental History 21 (1): 54-75.

Sarandis, Konstantinos. 2009, “Η ιδεολογία και ο πολιτικός χαρακτήρας του καθεστώτος Μεταξά” [The ideology and political character of the Metaxas΄ Regime]. In Ο Μεταξάς και η εποχή του [Metaxas and his Era], edited by Thanos Veremis, 45-71. Athens: Eurasia.

Settas, Nikolaos. 1961. “Τα μεγάλα παραγωγικά έργα της Μακεδονίας” [The grand productive works in Macedonia], Τεχνικά Χρονικά 199-200 [Technical Annals], 55. Athens.

Tserpes, Theodoros. 1938. Η ενάσκησις της αγροτικής πίστεως εν Ελλάδι [The exercise of agricultural credit in Greece]. Athens: Govostis.

Vatikiotis, Panagiotis. 2005. Μια πολιτική βιογραφία του Ιωάννη Μεταξά: Φιλολαϊκή απολυταρχία στην Ελλάδα, 1936-1941 [A Political Biography of Ioannis Metaxas: Popular Autocracy in Greece, 1936-1941]. Athens: Eurasia.

Vlachos, George L. 2021. “To make a land Hellenic: toward a national(ist) landscape in southern Macedonia, 1896–1932”, National Identities: 1-22.

Zink, Allan. 2000. “Greece: Political Crisis and Authoritarian Takeover”. In Conditions of Democracy in Europe, 1919–39: Systematic Case Studies, edited by Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Jeremy Mitchell, 213-241. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-12-17

Como Citar

Douros, D. ., & Angelis-Dimakis, D. (2021). Percepções e Usos da Terra: Retórica Agrária e Política Agrícola na Grécia sob o Regime de Metaxas (1936-1941). Perspectivas - Journal of Political Science, 25, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.3208

Edição

Vol. 25 (2021): his special issue aims to explore the en- vironmental dimension and engagement of Mediterranean fascist regimes inclusive of their colonial possessions. Methodologically, this has firstly implied to go beyond the narrow under- standing of environmental history as a discipline putting at the centre of its analysis natural or eco- logical elements and, secondly, to bridge environ- mental history with political and social history, and other historical subfields. Among the many themes touched in this volume, we would like to stress three more significant and overarching issues: reclamation as a material and ideological regeneration of people and places; modernity as the ideology through which fascist regimes em- ployed science and technology to create socio- ecologies at the service of their goals; and colo- nization (internal and external) as the concrete laboratory where reclamation and modernity were experimented as forms of control, regime-building, and oppression. Blending fascist studies and environmental history sounds like an unconventional scholarly enterprise. Seemingly, this is because the for- mer addresses complex and contradictory mix- tures of traditionalism, racial and scientific pos- itivism, anti-liberalism, corporatism, authoritari- anism, but also modernist ideologies and innova- tive forms of mass communication and mobiliza- tion. Whereas the latter is an academic discipline attentive to processes of natural depletion and conservation, and also considered quite progres- sive, we might argue. Even more than that, fascist studies and environmental history form an odd couple because the first line of enquiry is actually one of the most well-established areas of interest for historians of modern times, while the latter is often seen as a rather marginal or emerging field of studies, especially in the Mediterranean coun- tries. Finally, fascist and environmental histories form an unusual combination because according to traditional sub-disciplinary boundaries, envi- ronmental historians should not be concerned about themes like fascism. Quite the opposite, they should dedicate themselves to the confined niche of "the environment" (Armiero 2016). In this sense, our special issue questions the narrow understanding of "the environment" and propose a vision of our discipline not in terms of themes but rather of perspectives. The articles hosted in this special issue help clarify our vision. Not all of the authors would in fact define themselves environmental historians and, rather than checking disciplinary IDs at the borders of this special issue, we have opted for welcoming whoever was interested in looking at the fascist histories in their intertwining with nature and for learning from these mixed

Secção

Artigos